Mike Earley

My feedback

  1. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      needs more details  ·  3 comments  ·  We moved!  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
      Mike Earley commented  · 

      First, you've already got some nice visual snaps/queues, for example when you are sizing objects, and/or when you are moving objects around, good job on that.

      Now--let's say I've got ten text fields and ten labels above those text fields. I want to select all of them and click on an 'Align Left' button. Or maybe I've got a set of icons I've added, and I was moving quickly and they're not aligned. Let me collect them all with the selector and hit 'Align Center' or 'Align Bottom'. If you look at the controls in Illustrator, they've got 2 sets of controls--alignment and distribution. You can align horizontal left, center, right. Vertical left, center, right. Distribute horizontal on center, on left sides, on right sides. Distribute vertical on center, on top, on bottom. The additional control on all of this is that you can align to selection (meaning the objects you have selected will align themselves to each other only), align to artboard (meaning the objects will align to the center of the artboard).

    • 3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        under consideration  ·  0 comments  ·  We moved!  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
        Mike Earley shared this idea  · 
      • 23 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          planned  ·  4 comments  ·  We moved!  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
          Mike Earley shared this idea  · 
        • 5 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            2 comments  ·  We moved!  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            Mike Earley commented  · 

            If I draw a wireframe in OmniGraffle, and it's got a series of layers in a canvas, what I would expect here would be that those all get converted and appropriately layered into ID. Both applications have the same outline structure of elements and layers, so that concept is shared and should be transferrable. In OG, all objects are just vector graphics. This means it would be difficult to recognize and properly convert checks, radios, tabs, etc. But honestly, I'd be OK with that. What I would want would just be for it to automatically inherit everything as either shape objects or text objects, appropriately sequenced and layered, and if I want to convert something to a specific type of control (versus just a rectangle, I want a button, for example), I can make that change in ID after import.
            For me, the usage story/scenario is "As a long-time user of OG, I have quite a bit of documentation I don't want to re-create in ID. I would like to select an OG file and import that file into ID. ID would turn every canvas into a separate screen, and maintain colors, object ordering, font styling/size/color. ID would not attempt to interpret and convert 'like' objects (i.e. radio buttons in OG into actual radio buttons in ID). From here I can tweak the screens to add my interactivity as I want, but have saved myself a TON of time in initial creation of objects."

          • 203 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              10 comments  ·  We moved!  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
              Mike Earley supported this idea  · 
            • 90 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                I agree to the terms of service
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                16 comments  ·  We moved!  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                Mike Earley commented  · 

                Every application that has tried to implement full-scale export of HTML/CSS ends up with bad HTML/CSS. Dreamweaver, MS's old Homepage app, RapidWeaver, really, anything--you name it, if it generates HTML/CSS automatically, it's not usable.
                This is compounded, as you mention, when you get into an application using a framework like Dojo, Prototype, MooTools, jQuery, whatever--those frameworks have their own structures for how things must work. For example, Dojo's buttons require 2 div containers, and the ability to add images is applied to one of those containers--if it's applied to the other container it doesn't work.
                If you look at CSSHat by the group doing CSSPiffle, I think this is the best implementation, and is also what you are talking about as your recommendation. I.e pick an element and generate it's css/html structure, and let me copy paste that 'widget' of code out and use it.

              Feedback and Knowledge Base